Davisite Banner. Left side the bicycle obelisk at 3rd and University. Right side the trellis at the entrance to the Arboretum.

The Future of Davis is Rooted in Community: Why I Support Village Farms

By Linda Deos

As a member of the Davis City Council, my primary responsibility is to look toward the horizon. I am constantly asking: How do we preserve the soul of the city we love while ensuring it remains a viable, vibrant home for the next generation? Since the initial planning application for Village Farms was submitted in April 2023, I have engaged deeply with the details, the data, and—most importantly—the residents.

Over the last three years, this project has undergone rigorous public scrutiny, environmental review, and repeated refinement. After witnessing this collaborative process and reviewing the robust commitments secured in the project’s Baseline Features, I am proud to support Measure V. Village Farms Davis is not just another housing development; it is a meticulously planned extension of our community values.

Infrastructure That Connects Us

One of the most compelling aspects of Village Farms is its commitment to connectivity. Davis has long been the “Bicycle Capital of America,” but maintaining that title requires more than just nostalgia; it requires bold investment. Village Farms delivers this through two transformative pieces of infrastructure: the F Street bike and pedestrian overcrossing and the Pole Line Road undercrossing.

These are not mere “amenities.” They are essential safety improvements that bridge the gap between neighborhoods. The F Street overcrossing will provide a dedicated, grade-separated path that allows families and commuters to bypass heavy traffic, making active transportation the easiest and safest choice. Similarly, the Pole Line undercrossing addresses a long-standing bottleneck, ensuring that as our city grows, our ability to move through it without a car remains a reality. These investments reflect a vision of Davis where the bicycle remains the primary vehicle for community connection.

A Meaningful Commitment to Affordability

We often talk about the “missing middle” and the struggle for young families, teachers, and service workers to find a home in Davis. Village Farms takes a decisive step toward solving this. The project’s generous Affordable Housing commitments go beyond the standard requirements. By integrating a diverse range of housing types—from deed-restricted affordable units to innovative small footprint market rate to create housing for all ages and income levels can afford—Village Farms ensures that Davis remains a multi-generational community.

This is about equity. It is about ensuring that the people who work in our shops, teach in our schools, and staff our local businesses can actually afford to live in the city they serve. Since the 2023 submittal, the developer has significantly strengthened these commitments, including a $6 million contribution to the city’s housing trust fund and 16 acres of dedicated land for 100% affordable projects. This proposal provides the variety and volume of housing necessary to fill the gap in our housing market.

Integrity Guaranteed by the Voters

A common concern with large-scale projects is the fear of “bait and switch”—that the promises made today might be negotiated away tomorrow. This is where the Baseline Features of Village Farms are revolutionary. These features are legally binding and, thanks to our local land-use ordinances (Measures J, R, and D), they cannot be altered without another vote of the people.

When we talk about the 47 acres of protected habitat, the carbon-neutral energy goals, or the specific traffic mitigation measures, we aren’t talking about suggestions. These are locked-in guarantees. This structure puts the power exactly where it belongs: in the hands of Davis voters. It ensures that the high bar we have set for this project remains high through every phase of construction.

Environmental Stewardship and Protected Space

Davis has always been a leader in environmental policy, and Village Farms honors that legacy. The inclusion of 47 acres of permanently protected habitat is a testament to the project’s “land-first” philosophy. This space isn’t just “leftover” land; it is a functional, managed ecosystem designed to support local biodiversity and provide a natural buffer.

Beyond the habitat, the project’s commitment to environmental sustainability is exhaustive. From all-electric building requirements to integrated water conservation systems and onsite agricultural components, Village Farms functions as a living laboratory for sustainable urban growth. It proves that we can add homes while simultaneously reducing our per-capita environmental footprint.

Addressing Traffic and Growth Responsibly

I have listened to many neighbors express their concerns about traffic. It is a valid concern, and one that has been addressed with unprecedented rigor during the environmental impact report process. The commitments to traffic improvements are robust, focusing on optimizing existing intersections and funding regional improvements that benefit more than just the new residents. By emphasizing internal “walkability” and providing the aforementioned bike crossings, Village Farms is designed to internalize trips, keeping cars off our main arterials whenever possible.

Growth is inevitable, but it must be managed with intention. Since 2023, we have had the time to hammer out the specifics, ensuring that this project doesn’t just “fit” in Davis, but improves it. We have a choice: we can allow Davis to become an exclusive enclave, or we can embrace a future that is inclusive, sustainable, and connected.

A Vote for Our Values

Over the last three years, I have seen the Village Farms team listen, adapt, and strengthen their proposal based on community and Council feedback. What started as a strong application in April 2023 has evolved into a project that truly reflects the unique spirit of Davis.

Village Farms Davis offers a path forward that protects our environment, builds the homes we desperately need, and invests in the infrastructure that defines us. It is a project rooted in the belief that Davis’s best days are ahead of us. I invite you to join me in supporting this vision. Let’s choose a future where our children can afford to live, where our commuters can bike safely, and where our natural habitats are preserved for generations to come.

Please join me in voting Yes on Measure V.

Linda Deos is a Councilmember for the City of Davis.

Davisite logo

Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.

Comments

6 responses to “The Future of Davis is Rooted in Community: Why I Support Village Farms”

  1. I appreciate Councilmember Deos expressing her viewpoints to citizens and sending this op-ed to the Davisite. What I find discouraging — and the same goes for the op-ed that Councilmember Vaitla wrote — is that they both act as though the affordable housing is a guaranteed part of the project without responding to the concerns that David Thompson and I have raised about the language (or lack thereof) in the Baseline Features and Development Agreement that do not in fact guarantee affordable housing (of either kind).

  2. Ron O

    I like the Village Farms site the way it is – a highly visible reminder that Davis is connected to farming. I like looking at sunflowers and tomatoes (and the mountains beyond, to the west) more than housing developments. It would be a loss to cover it with a development.

    Seems to me that (looking around the area), there is no “shortage” of sprawl – and it’s continuing to occur. And then there’s the traffic it would generate. Pretty simple, really. All of the other nonsense regarding school closures, people supposedly “missing” from Davis, fake housing “mandates” – it’s all just noise intended to fool people into voting for something that makes their own lives/town WORSE, and irreversibly destroy high quality farmland with the largest development ever proposed for Davis.

    As far as the people “missing” from Davis, has anyone considered plastering their faces on milk cartons or billboards? That probably worked once or twice. Or maybe one of those alerts you see on freeways these days?

    As for me, I was initially “missing” from the Bay Area (as are probably half the people in the Sacramento region).

  3. Eileen Samitz

    Unfortunately, the Village Farms project is far from the description in this article. Village Farms is a disastrous project due to many reasons including: the toxics leaking carcinogenic PFAS “forever chemicals”, the 200-acre floodplain with flooding potential, massive traffic including more than 15,000 additional car trips PER DAY at Covell Blvd and Pole Line Rd, enormous infrastructure costs, habitat destruction including tearing out hundreds of trees along Channel and endangering the vernal pools due to the re-routing of Channel A which would disrupt the hydrology that the vernal pools depend upon for survival, UNaffordable housing, and an abysmal affordable housing plan which would most likely result with ZERO affordable housing units due to word “may” loophole included in the Development Agreement.

    It’s A “May” Day for Village Farms

    These are just some of the reasons why the Village Farms project needs to be voted down by Davis voters on June 2nd. Then, the project can be re-planned at the Reduced Footprint alternative similar to the Covell Village “Environmentally Superior” alternative which would be developing only below Channel A which distances the housing from the toxics and the enormous floodplain.

    This plan also avoids the need to fill in the flood plain which is located predominately above Channel A and avoids the need to re-route Channel A. A conservation easement would be needed to be in place to protect the vernal pools, and developing 900-1.000 housing units on the site. This alternative avoids the toxics and floodplain issues, but also avoids the City liability issues that the current Village Farms project would impose on the City long-term.

  4. crillybutler

    The No campaign has legitimate concerns about floodplain engineering, groundwater contamination proximity, and developer follow-through — but has wrapped them in some demonstrably overstated claims (the $740,000 minimum, the Love Canal analogy, the traffic number without mitigation). However, the affordability question is still real — land donation commitments and cash contributions are not the same as built units, and the phasing structure matters. The Yes side’s market-rate homes will not be cheap by any standard; the affordability case rests on the deed-restricted units and the general theory that adding supply helps prices broadly.

    The Yes campaign has a strong institutional case — unanimous City Council certification of the EIR, state acceptance, the largest affordable housing commitment in Davis history — but the developer track record concern is real. The question is whether the required improvements will actually be delivered. Critics note that the developer behind Nishi was approved over seven years ago and has not yet delivered that project or its promised grade-separated crossing. That’s a legitimate track-record concern. Developer commitments on paper and developer follow-through in practice are different things.

    The real question here is whether we trust that the mitigation commitments will be enforced, the affordable units will be built, and the traffic improvements will be delivered — versus whether this project’s flaws are substantial enough that you’d rather send it back for a redesign.

    1. Crilly, I think you’ve given a good analysis of the different ways of thinking about the project, but I have to take issue with “the largest affordable housing commitment in Davis history” — as I’ve shown on a Davisite article (and also a Davis Enterprise op ed), there is in fact no commitment to affordable housing. Willowgrove, by comparison, has put their affordable housing in the Baseline Features without the “but see the Developer Agreement” clause that Village Farms has. And I don’t buy the supply-demand argument because demand can come from anywhere outside of Davis. So increasing supply, when our prices are much cheaper than the Bay Area, won’t likely have any effect on prices.

  5. […] article responds to the endorsement of the Village Farms project by Councilmember Linda Deos, published by The Davisite and the Davis Vanguard on May 9. Deos was appointed to the planning […]

Leave a comment