I knew this Yes on H campaign was off to an ignominious start when I started receiving phone calls. A lot of phone calls. All seeking my opinion. Developers care about my thoughts? Not likely. When you get THAT many phone calls, you know the pockets pushing a project are deep, aggressive, and expect to make a lot of money. They don’t like anyone getting in their way. Then a sitting city Davis city council member, who heads the Yes on H campaign, sued the opposition with the apparent intent of snuffing out dissenting voices. This lawsuit against the No on H folks felt Trump inspired: sic lawyers on any opposition and financially drain them into submission. That’ll teach ’em to speak up!
The Yes on H folks are trying to create the illusion that this enormous industrial development will attract people seeking nature. This project is simultaneously being billed as helping solve the housing crisis in Davis (it won’t), helping endangered species (by paving almost 100 of acres of land, I guess) and solving climate change (because some people may take the bus or bike out there). Their “transit plaza” is …a bus stop. See how easy solving world climate change was! All solved with a single development! Wow. I guess mentioning “world peace” was too much of a stretch, even for them. Maybe next time, after they’ve had their way with Davis, they’ll say that their NEXT mega development will solve the Middle East Crisis.
When they expect over 2,500 employees working at site, yet only 460 housing units (with no guarantee that residents in the development are actually working at the site) … then … well, it’s not going to be an environmental utopia, no matter the grand the promises. No solving the Climate Crisis. No world peace either, I guess.
Davis needs to vote no on this project before the project leaders shut down any more voices that they don’t like with their lawyers.
Liz Reay
Davis
Davisite 
Leave a reply to Roberta L. Millstein Cancel reply