In reference to the Village Farms Scoping Session
The City has asked citizens to comment on the Village Farms project. Here are mine…
by David J. Thompson
The project is based on obsolete planning principles which feature the single family home.
Preponderance of SF homes in this era is absurd for a town that thinks it’s green.
Global Warming is guaranteed and increased by this car-centric planning model.
Too few market-rate apartments for a community with such a low vacancy rate for the past 30 years. The lack of market rate apartments means tens of thousands of Students and working people will continue over paying on rent given the continued low vacancy rate.
There should be many more market rate apartments to bring down the excessive rental costs in Davis. Most of the 55.7% of Davis households (the 36,780 renters) are already overpaying rent (more than 30% of income spent on rent is HUD guideline).
Dos Pinos housing co-op has been the most successful home ownership program in Davis. 38 years later it is still providing substantial savings for its moderate income owners. It helps families time and time again rather than a one off bonanza and it’s gone forever. There are 122 households on the waiting list for DP (60 units) and the list has been closed since 2017 (2021 info from DP). There are between 6-10 turnovers per year. Why was another Dos Pinos co-op not included in Village Farms?






SUBJECT: "Support the Vanguard on #GivingTuesday" [Monday's Van Guard]
I have a rule for Taking Tuesday — if someone asks me for money, or even uses the cringe phrase "Giving Tuesday", I never give them any money ever, and furthermore attempt to take money from them. On Monday, the Van's Guard mentioned giving Tuesday, with open comments. Did someone not consider that closing comments would be a good idea, given past experience? Oh, yeah, you got rid of that pesky Alan Miller guy. Still . . .