Davisite Banner. Left side the bicycle obelisk at 3rd and University. Right side the trellis at the entrance to the Arboretum.

It’s Time for New Leadership for our CA-4 House Seat

By Scott Steward

Eric Jones at one of his Meet and Greets held throughout the District

At this critical time, as we confront the destruction of our democratic institutions and equal representation under the law, we have a choice to make while we can still vote.  

There is no need to worry that a Democratic primary challenge will eliminate all Democrats from our safely blue district race. In this year’s District CA-4 Congressional primary election on June 2nd (early voting starts on Monday, May 4th), we can vote for one of the two leading Democratic candidates: Mike Thompson or Eric Jones.  

Mike Thompson, the 28-year incumbent, has shown that no amount of phone calls and letters will change his commitment to a system that “trusts the process.” Thompson’s politics will not allow him to raise taxes on gross excess (oil, drug, gambling, tech, and the weapons industries). He has and will continue to rationalize excessive profits and justify incarceration at home and $6 trillion (since 2001) in support of endless war

Girls’ school in Minab, 150 girls killed by a US attack in Minab, Iran, on Saturday, 2/28/2026. (picture from Guardian.org)

Even though Thompson shares many of the same values I and most Yolo County residents hold, he has not fought for them hard enough. The question is, after so many years of his leadership, why are we entering another in the series of forever wars abroad, why are Americans staring down the barrel of ICE agents’ guns at home, and why can only one-fifth of 25–40-year-old Californians afford to buy a home?

These trends don’t seem to require Thompson to examine his approach, as he explained at the League of Women Voters meeting in June of 2025 “they do a ranking of bipartisanship, and I always rank real high….If we are going to do big things, we need to be bipartisan; otherwise, every time we have a majority change it all goes away.”  What is not going away, Trump and Project 2025. Get along politics has been emptying the pockets of 90% of us for 50 years; Thompson has been in office for most of them.

Eric Jones is Thompson’s challenger. Jones is a 35-year-old self-made entrepreneur. He grew up in Maine, where his family faced and overcame financial hardship. His mother worked for low wages as a nurse, married to a disabled war veteran. Eric’s older half-brother, Joe, served in the Navy. Eric is no stranger to struggle and understands the essential role of government safety nets. His mother made good use of aid to further her nursing career and supplement the household income. A top student, Eric attended Yale on scholarship and moved to California in his 20s, where he has settled in Napa to raise his family.

“I’m not taking corporate PAC money, I’m not taking lobbyist cash, and I’ll never trade a stock in Congress. This campaign is fueled by people who work for a living ….”  Eric Jones

Eric is part of a wave of younger Democratic primary challengers who have been raised without illusions about how badly we need to remake the Democratic Party from the bottom up. We have an opportunity to send a message to DC and to the California Democratic Party’s captured delegate system (which just voted to endorse a host of incumbents, including Thompson). 

Eric Jones is running for the CA-4 seat in the U.S. House of Representatives.  Instead of wasting time we don’t have trying to untie the Gordian knot, Eric wants to cut the ties that bind us to the failed incremental doom train.  A train that provides the military industry with literally countless dollars, corporations with unregulated profiteering, and promotes social dystopia.

It took the shooting of Renee Good to get Thompson to rally us around impeaching Kristi Noem (there had been 37 ICE killings before Good’s). The outrage is late, coming now that Thompson has a challenger, and challenger Eric Jones is taking the job of winning our vote very seriously. We have given Thompson and the Democratic leaders the moral high ground time and time again. The cost of their failure to stick to principle is too high.

How many times are we, the hardworking volunteers for a just, democratic America, going to hand over the moral momentum and a series of Democratic upsets, like those leading up to the November 4, 2025, victories (NY Mayor Mamdani, Virginia Governor, and New Jersey Governor), only to see, just 6 days later, the current Senate Minority Leader, Schumer, convince 7 “Democratic” senators (including the Nevada Senators Jackie Rosen and Cortez Masto – also owing their victories to huge national grassroots support) to vote to open government and fund ICE to the tune of $9.9 billion? We did not get health care funding. We did get a DHS-approved path to unlimited H-2B foreign worker visas, used to undercut US tech workers. Thompson does not seem that upset.

Eric Jones is committed to building a better future and has assembled a team to win the opportunity to do so as our representative in the House. Not to be unappreciative of our local elected officials, but in our time, no one among CA-4’s established Democratic elected officials rose to challenge Thompson. This is something our majority party should consider.

Eric Jones is not a professional politician, and he is not on the doom train that Thompson wants us to keep riding. I support sending Eric Jones to Congress because he stands against the system of “get-along politics.” He has not been groomed by the captured portion of the California Democratic Party. He is smart and will not find an excuse to do anything less than make this world a better place for his children. He is committed to affordability, access to health care, housing, and childcare. Eric is a fighter and has the independence to represent all of District CA 4 in Congress.  

Davisite logo

Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.

Comments

27 responses to “It’s Time for New Leadership for our CA-4 House Seat”

  1. I’m going to basically repeat the remarks that I made on Scott’s last post, since they apply to this one as well:

    I have seen a number of Davis progressives supporting Eric Jones, but honestly, I don’t get it. He’s young, yes. New, yes. Not Mike Thompson, yes. Beyond that, when I look at the platform outlined on his website, I see a lot of nice generalizations, but nothing that gets me particularly excited about him as a progressive. To give just one example, he talks about expanding Medicare, but I don’t see him supporting Medicare for All. Ok, another example: “Crack down on PG&E’s high prices and monopoly abuses.” How facilitating municipalities taking over their own energy systems, a la SMUD?

    So, I’m supposed to jettison a known, reliable quantity (Mike Thompson) for an unknown who has never held political office, someone who we really don’t know how they are going to vote, and whose website can’t even commit to fully progressive ideas? I must be missing something. Maybe he is telling people things in person, but frankly, I’ve been told things by politicians before and had them not follow through. And that includes stated platforms, much less promises at political events!

    To those remarks, I would now add: I think it’s pretty outrageous for Scott to put that photo of the recently declared war on Iran in the article, implying that Thompson is responsible, even though he has strongly expressed his opposition to this new war. If you object to some of Thompson’s votes, fine, but to say that he is responsible for this recent decision is over the top. If I’m going to point fingers at anyone on the left as to how we got where we are right now, I’m going to point it at those folks who were so keen to criticize Democrats over Gaza, including Biden and Harris. They are complicit in Trump getting elected. Of course, time is showing what anyone who was paying attention should have expected, that Trump is bad not only for our country but also for Gaza and the rest of the world. That some of those folks stayed home or caused others to stay home makes my blood boil. Those folks need to look in the mirror and rethink their priorities.

    1. And as I think I added before, I would happily support a genuine progressive over Mike Thompson. I just see no real evidence that Eric Jones is that person.

      1. Donna Davies

        Imagine how low the bar in one’s moral reasoning has to be to equate “purity testing” to opposing genocide.

        There were other choices.
        Any informed 2024 Democrat in the super majoritarian, delegate-rich blue state of CA who is seeking change within their national party platform and who even remotely understands the way the electoral college works, understood that the 2024 rhetoric slung at progs by garden variety liberals about “wasting votes” was heavily ironic, since Harris already had Cal EC votes in the bag. Hence, the wasted vote was the one cast for the foregone establishmentarian conclusion who represented zero hope for substantive change. When asked in a pivotal interview “what would you do differently than (then tanking incumbent) President Biden?” VP Harris literally replied “Nothing.”

        Mainstream Dems have lost their way. Absolutely feckless “opposition” party, aging out and still focused on appeasing its mega donors, PACs, super PACs and the consultant class over the cries of the electorate. Is it any wonder their rolls are shrinking? Can’t reform from within by re-upping and rewarding incumbents who refuse to reform or listen to the will of their constituents.

        Thompson consistently abandons working class voters, women, students, the environment, and marginalized communities. An immoral hawk who supported a modern genocide.

        My vote’s on Eric Jones.

      2. You assume a lot about what my beliefs and actions are. Most of it is false, but I owe you no explanations. You can take it as a data point that many of us — across varying degrees of “left” — blame those who chose to campaign against Harris once our actual choices were Harris or Trump. Ignore that data point if you like. But we see the blood on your hands and we see your responsibility in this disastrous presidency. I will always be deeply resentful of that.

      3. Donna Davies

        I wrote:
        “If we continue to nourish the illusion that everything will be okay and get back to “normal” when Trump is gone, but the current blue Congress remains, we will be woefully unprepared for what comes after Trump.”

        You wrote:
        “I agree with all of this 100%”

        To state that you agree with, yet need more evidence for why thousands in the CA-4 are no longer interested in re-upping a center-right, status quotidian, “known quantity” career politician, Mike Thompson, is a contradiction.

        We all need only follow the money, the influences of corporate lobbying (and the atrocious corresponding policy record purchased by that money) on Thompson to understand why folks are ready to situate someone new like Eric Jones to represent them, a candidate who is not accepting that dirty money and not beholden to those dirty lobbies.

        Insanity is repeating the same votes for Thompson over and over again, expecting different results.

        “I’d rather vote for something I want and not get it, than vote for something I don’t want and get it.” – Eugene V. Debs

      4. There is no contradiction. It’s not as though anybody would necessarily be better than Thompson. There are some who would be worse, or who would be the same but less experienced in how to get things done — and with all of the criticisms lobbed against Thompson, some of which are legitimate and some of which are not — he has done some good things. So I ask again if there is some other information about Eric that would tip the scales to give people like me reason to think that Eric would be better. Not taking corporate lobby money is good, I agree, but I have supported candidates like that before and still been disappointed. I have heard a lot of promises, and when someone’s promises aren’t even that bold, and they have no track record to go on, then they don’t get my vote. I’d rather vote for something I want, too, and I wish that I had some evidence for that. But I have asked and asked and not gotten an answer, so I can only assume that the answers aren’t there. I’m genuinely sorry to hear that.

      5. Donna Davies

        So stop criticizing, accept your oppression, pipe down, reject the prospect of political change, and just keep electing these liars, cheats and thieves until they croak or leave on their own volition. Because tHeY hAvE eXpEriEnCe ! lol

        This position that “not as though anybody would necessarily be better than Thompson. There are some who would be worse, or who would be the same but less experienced in how to get things done” is absolute nihilism. Anti-progress. And rooted in zero evidence. Incumbent politicians like Thompson coming upon such remarks are disincentivized from reforming or earning that prematurely promised vote. Don’t obey in advance.

        Steward outlined more than enough reasons to reject Thompson and take a chance on a fresh candidate with much more in common with you than a rich neoliberal, corporate $hill of a man with every privilege and access box checked since the day he was born. A real “experienced” tax wasting, racist, militarist, genocidal monster.

        Good grief.

      6. Good luck with his campaign. You’re going to need it with your approach, but you seem more interested in making insults and trying to score points than winning a campaign. You do him no favors. Again, good luck with that.

    2. Donna Davies

      The autopsy on that tragic election was performed by analysts who know what they are talking about. Millions of voters could not cross a moral red line to vote for Harris. The party had more than ample warning. The uncommitted movement was not asking for much in exchange for their votes. Merely stop slaughtering civilians, stop bombing hospitals and schools, stop killing journalists.

      Yet, garden variety liberals apparently think persons using their political voices to stop a genocide (not politicians who refused to shift course on violent imperial zionism) are complicit in the second rise of Trump. Gazan lives have value. They are equally deserving of safety from fascism. You, your children and your grandchildren are their equals. Join the moral body saying no to genocide, no to war.

      Trump would not have returned if the corrupt and feckless Democratic party had not: let an old genocidal corrupt man with dementia stay in office so long; reneged on covid relief; smashed union strikes in favor of railroad barons; voted down a raise in the minimum wage; took a public healthcare option off the table in first pass at the BBB, during a deadly pandemic no less; opened up cop cities in a BLM era; ended asylum; run a full scale genocide; then shoved in his fatally unpopular vp (who couldn’t even win her own populous state in the 2020 primaries), 4 months before the election and reached for the Cheneys as surrogates.

      Groups to ignore post election:
      1) liberals saying this is anyone’s fault but the DNC & MSM’s
      2) liberals who thought it would be strategic to elect a vegetable and his wildly unpopular sidecar Sally as a bulwark against the rising fascist tide
      3) liberals who said nothing as their president’s neural plaque mounted day after day. For four years.
      4) anyone postulating foreign election influence by Russia, but not Israel (AIPAC).
      5) liberals who think Trump v2 won’t be as bad as he promised to be.

      1. “The autopsy on that tragic election was performed by analysts who know what they are talking about. Millions of voters could not cross a moral red line to vote for Harris.”

        Indeed. And here we are. Those folks traded their self-styled moral purity, wishing we had different choices than the ones we actually had, for the disaster we have now — one that, as I noted already, has hurt Gazans too. I hope that moral purity tastes good in your mouth, because that’s about all it’s done.

    3. Donna Davies

      The resentment of persons tolerant of a modern Holocaust and now dragged so far to the right by deadwood Democrats as to be aligned with the Cheneys implies we’re getting something right.

      This country has been giving off such big Weimar vibes for years.
      You’d think it was Germany
      100 years ago.

      In 1924, the government of Weimar Germany decided to get rid of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, or Nazis, by trying Hitler for high treason in the People’s Court. Hitler was clearly guilty. He had tried to overthrow the elected government in the botched 1923 “Beer Hall Putsch,” which, like the January 6 riot, was as much farce as insurrection. It was an open and shut case. The trial, however, backfired, turning Hitler into a national martyr and boosting the political fortunes of the Nazis.

      The reason should have been apparent. Germany, convulsed by widespread unemployment, food riots, street violence and hyperinflation, was a mess.
      The ruling elites, like our own, had no credibility. The appeal to the rule of law and democratic values was a joke.

      For the people in the back:
      Trump is not an anomaly. Not a mistake or an accident. Trump is the very natural and expected consequence of 40+ years of increasingly neoconservative and neoliberal control of our political system, corporate oligarchic control of our economic system and the rise of authoritarianism required to sustain that arrangement. All over the world.

      Repeat. He was not a fluke or an outlier. Trump must be viewed in a context of sociopolitical, geopolitical, cultural and economic forces and movements. Considered in a sequence of elected officials, like every other president.

      If we continue to nourish the illusion that everything will be okay and get back to “normal” when Trump is gone, but the current blue Congress remains, we will be woefully unprepared for what comes after Trump.

      Recognize Palestinians’ humanity and stop suggesting others’ make choices that sacrifice that humanity. We do not support Mike Thompson’s right wing “kinder, gentler” genocide just bc it looks more polite. Begin to see the connection btwn the US-sponsored, Thompson-approved slaughter, seizure, surveillance and occupation of Gaza and the ICE machine unleashed on our own streets today.

      Eric Jones for California’s 4th.

      1. You write:

        Trump is not an anomaly. Not a mistake or an accident. Trump is the very natural and expected consequence of 40+ years of increasingly neoconservative and neoliberal control of our political system, corporate oligarchic control of our economic system and the rise of authoritarianism required to sustain that arrangement. All over the world.

        Repeat. He was not a fluke or an outlier. Trump must be viewed in a context of sociopolitical, geopolitical, cultural and economic forces and movements. Considered in a sequence of elected officials, like every other president.

        If we continue to nourish the illusion that everything will be okay and get back to “normal” when Trump is gone, but the current blue Congress remains, we will be woefully unprepared for what comes after Trump.

        I agree with all of this. 100%. I don’t know why you would think otherwise.

        Somehow you think that Eric Jones will help pull us out of this. All I am saying — all I have said — is that I see no evidence of that. And I can’t help but notice that both you and Scott spend an awful lot of time criticizing Mike Thompson (you also throw in a few personal insults for good measure) and very little time giving information about Eric Jones himself. You may be willing to vote for Not-Thompson but I need more than that before I can cast a vote. And I suspect I am not the only one. So you and Scott can keep trashing Thompson all you want, but the fact is that he is a very known quantity and all we have from Eric Jones is a bunch of lukewarm vague promises and no record. That’s not a positive recipe for winning an election. I suggest if you really want to succeed you will change tactics. And if you think I am already “lost” because I am one of “them,” boy, then you’ve definitely lost the election, because I’m one of the people who ought to be easily convinced to vote against Thompson. And I don’t know how I can say it any more clearly: Continued bashing of Thompson, especially when it’s out of line like Scott associating him with Feb 28, isn’t going to do it.

        Give people more about Eric Jones, if there is actually more to say.

    4. Eugene A

      “I’m going to point it at those folks who were so keen to criticize Democrats over Gaza, including Biden and Harris.”

      Going into the election the majority of democrat voters disagreed with Biden/Harris/Schumer/Jeffries/etc on support for Israel. It was not some gigantic shock that they lost votes because of this – it was entirely predictable. The democrats knew how their base felt and they ignored them. You can blame the millions of voters who felt this way – I personally blame the party. Pretty sick of “we’re not as bad as that guy” being your main selling point.

      “time is showing what anyone who was paying attention should have expected, that Trump is bad not only for our country but also for Gaza”

      You’re implying here that Harris would have not been bad for Gaza? Or maybe slightly less bad? Slightly less genocide? I see no reason to believe either party winning the election would have resulted in a meaningful change concerning what Israel is doing there.

      “I think it’s pretty outrageous for Scott to put that photo of the recently declared war on Iran in the article, implying that Thompson is responsible, even though he has strongly expressed his opposition to this new war”

      Expressing opposition to something does not absolve you of responsibility. Israel has wanted to attack Iran for decades. Thompson has voted in favor of sending billions in military aid to Israel. And maybe Rubio said the quiet part out loud recently but the idea that an Israel-Iran war would not have involved the US is obviously laughable.

      1. Donna Davies

        Eugene: Cogent. Accurate.
        Insightful. Thank you.

        So are we paying taxes this year or do we just Zelle Israel directly ?

  2. Donna Lemongello

    yeah, thought the same to myself, as anti gaza as Thompson is, I do not know why this is better.

  3. Scott

    Please use this version with the paragraphs seperated – (word to http missed this)

    I expect that you and I will not personally agree on every topic, even as I expect we will agree on many. As the curator of the Davisite, I don’t think you are obligated to be objective, but please hold back on being dismissive because you disagree – I will do my best to do the same.

    I believe the idea of jettisoning a known quantity isn’t what elections achieve. Candidates run, and we vote every two years, which, unfortunately, is more than most people want to pay attention to. Our “investment” in Thompson’s incumbency is not worth the price of what he represents – the same kind of thinking and doing that has created the most inequity, poorest healthcare, most people killed by guns, and the most people in prison than any other industrialized nation in the world. By what other metric would you suggest we decide on when getting rid of leadership that has failed so miserably?

    While Eric might not be in favor of Medicare for all, he is in favor of universal child and elderly care. Thompson has moved away from any form of single-payer.

    Thompson is not ordained, and 28 years later, are we better off? I would say most definitely not. Is the Democratic Party in our region able to think out of the box to offer a more effective candidate? Apparently not.

    Thompson is in office; he has the authority and public position to use in the House. He writes tax policy and approves appropriations bills for military spending. Thompson is very much responsible for how our military has grown and for its misuse.

    While it may be hard to hear, Donna Davies presents an accurate synopsis of the many opportunities missed and the too common duplicity of the Democratic Party. We could debate each instance in Donna’s synopsis. Instead, can we establish that the synopsis is part of the truth we contend with and validate each other – both the grief and the need to move forward.

    Eric Jones is ready to serve CA-4 well. Whether you would vote for him or not, his run is likely the biggest reason Thompson is more vocal and active, and we will see if Thompson can be more effective. I don’t think he has the capacity, and that is one of the reasons why I am voting for Eric.

    1. Scott, I will express my opinion, whether it comes across as “dismissive” or not, respectfully as I always have. As you know I have had deep concerns with many of the things you have posted here, and yet I posted them anyway. You always say that you want to bring people together but then you say things that are incendiary, such as tying Thompson to the Feb 28 killings. If you really wanted to bring progressives together, you would behave differently. But you and I have been over and over this. I think you aren’t going to change, and neither am I.

      So yes, we disagree on Eric. I wish a true and clear progressive, such as the ones that are running in other parts of the US, were running in our district. I just have no reason to believe that Eric is that person. You are willing to take a leap of faith on him, but I am not. I do think it’s possible to go out of the fat and into the fire.

      So there we are.

      If you want a blog that is run differently, I suggest you start one. They are very low cost.

  4. Scott, I will express my opinion, whether it comes across as “dismissive” or not, respectfully as I always have. As you know I have had deep concerns with many of the things you have posted here, and yet I posted them anyway. You always say that you want to bring people together but then you say things that are incendiary, such as tying Thompson to the Feb 28 killings. If you really wanted to bring progressives together, you would behave differently. But you and I have been over and over this. I think you aren’t going to change, and neither am I.

    So yes, we disagree on Eric. I wish a true and clear progressive, such as the ones that are running in other parts of the US, were running in our district. I just have no reason to believe that Eric is that person. You are willing to take a leap of faith on him, but I am not. I do think it’s possible to go out of the fat and into the fire.

    So there we are.

    If you want a blog that is run differently, I suggest you start one. They are very low cost.

  5. Alan C. Miller

    DD, the problem with your argument is that it replaces analysis with theatrical accusation and then treats the accusation as proof. You declare such things as genocide, modern holocaust, fascism, oligarchy, Weimar Germany, corporate capture, and moral red lines, and once the words are said you proceed as though the case has been established. What you have done is stack moral absolutes on top of each other and then demand that everyone accept your conclusion as the only ethical position.

    RM’s point, which you never actually answer, is simple: what specifically about Eric Jones demonstrates that he would govern differently or more effectively than the incumbent you are denouncing? Your response is not evidence about Jones; it is a torrent of condemnation about Thompson and everyone else who is not as politically-left extremist as yourself and SS. Yours are not campaign arguments, they are campaign suicide. Pretty sure EJ would like you to tone it down or go away, similar to how much of the Muslim Brotherhood considers Hamas to be ‘too violent’ and would prefer they take it down a notch ;-).

    SS’s response exposes the gap even more clearly. The case against Thompson rests on his actual record in office, votes, policies, outcomes that can be examined and debated. Your case rests on slogans and sweeping historical analogies that treat disagreement as moral depravity. Calling the incumbent a genocidal monster or invoking Weimar Germany does not supply evidence that your preferred candidate will deliver better policy outcomes. It simply raises the rhetorical temperature and invokes that tired tactic of the rhetorical simpleton: Godwin’s Law.

    All this creates the structural weakness in everything you wrote. You claim moral clarity while refusing the basic burden of political persuasion to demonstrate why the alternative you advocate is concretely better. If the entire argument for Eric Jones is that Mike Thompson is evil, corrupt, genocidal, racist, neoliberal, and fascist all at once, then that argument collapses the moment someone asks the obvious question that RM asked repeatedly: what, specifically, does Jones do better?

    The fact that your response to that question is more denunciation rather than an answer reveals only that there is no there, there. I’ve seen how you argue, so there is no value in continuing. I know you will have no ability to stop yourself from responding to me. I will not be there — have fun in your boxing match with a glove that has left the ring.

    Unless you insult my mother. Then “I’ll Be Back”.

    1. Donna Davies

      Ah yes Alan, of course, more tone policing. Noted.

      Funny, neither you, nor R Millstein has refuted the content or policy analyses of Thompson and his fellow blue centrist Trump enablers, here.

      Few things more disconcerting in an era of grotesque wealth inequality than observing partisan tribalist thousandaires carry water for millionaires who have thrown them under the bus for 28 years.

      And the wild political spectrum labels like extremist. Ironic when there is nothing more extremist than a policy of vaporizing civilians with bunker busters, letting people die, go undertreated or bankrupt for the unfortunate mishap of coming down sick in the United States, or voting to spare ultra right wing House Speaker Mike “conversion therapy” Johnson, all signature Thompson positions.

      Eric Jones has visibility and information about his readiness and fitness to serve all over the district, in this article and others, in past ones, in content to come and on your primary ballot information pamphlet. Do your due diligence. No one can conduct better research for you than you. At the very least, examine and scrutinize Jones’ (and others’) planks, accomplishments, background and fitness with more vigor and wonking than you have devoted to the corporate ho hum incumbent $hill you’re defending. Perhaps also ask yourself how continually running to the right, ignoring the most salient cries and policy demands of the DP rank n file today, has worked out for the party brass? And how the DP’s myopic focus on bipartisan collaboration with fascists and servility to the monied is systematically dismantling now every current and future generation’s chances of a decent life in this country.

      1. There was a very interesting letter to the editor in the Davis Enterprise yesterday about Thompson’s backing vs Jones’s:

        Curious about Primary Election funding, I reviewed public Federal Election Commission filings from both 4th Congressional District candidates.

        I saw a broad base of support for Mike Thompson, predominantly from his district. In contrast, a small select set of donors fund newly resident Eric Jones — and only five households are from his district! One-third are from out of state.

        Besides using his own personal fortune, Jones is backed by only 200 households — mostly from Silicon Valley, many working for venture-capital and investment firms. Over 80% donate the maximum allowed $7,000.

        In contrast, Thompson is supported by over 500 households. Fewer than 10% donated more than $1,000. Over 300 organizations, tribes and PACs representing professional and labor groups, wineries, and companies provide backing. All but seven of these donations were under the maximum allowable amount of $7,000. The average was slightly more than $2,500.

        On a different note, I don’t see anything on Jones’s website about how he would fund the military (or not) or about his position on Israel/Gaza. So I wonder why you and Scott think he’d be different from Thompson on that score.

      2. Alan C. Miller

        Thank you for not insulting my mother 😐

  6. Donna Davies

    R. Millstein: the DE editorial you quote here is an unserious analysis. Rather than relying on a poorly constructed and failed hit piece letter written by someone else who is not in this forum to expound or defend it for us (spoiler alert: they can’t), take your own cursory look at the public FEC site identifying the funding and source money for the campaigns: Jones’ and Thompson’s. Scroll down to the category on each candidate’s sites called “Other committee contributions”. (the section where PAC, corporate, national/state party committees, and special interest organizations’ are reported). On Jones’ filings you’ll find zero 0$ in contributions from any of these entities. And $0 donors of that ilk. On Thompson’s you’ll find nearly $1,000,000 raised in this quarter and 445 entries from the usual suspects who purchase anti-citizen, anti-worker, anti-environmental, and anti-peace policy from both sides of the aisle including LockheedMartin, NY banks, NJ PACs, health insurance banking, national party boost dollars, for profit Hospital orgs, Energy lobbies, etc.

    Individual donations from individual citizens that conform to small legal limits set by the FEC is the way federal campaign financing should work. I think we can agree on that much.

    Thank you.

    1. I will look into this. In the meantime, your failure to respond to my question, “On a different note, I don’t see anything on Jones’s website about how he would fund the military (or not) or about his position on Israel/Gaza. So I wonder why you and Scott think he’d be different from Thompson on that score” is glaringly obvious.

      1. Donna Davies

        R. Millstein:
        Analyze EJ’s campaign social media. Particularly content related to the intergenerational effects of militarism, lopsided domestic and foreign intervention spending and war profiteering.

        Let’s be clear, though. This was a conversation about the midterms.
        Candidates. Electoral politics. A cast of characters seeking (and refusing to let go of) power and influence. But, truly, if you want fascism to go away, I have sad news for you. Mere ballots never stopped a fascist. Ever. Anywhere.

        (Certainly not prematurely promising our primary votes to the stagnant incumbent for absolutely nothing of substantive reform or course correction in return)

        This country is deeply sick. In need of radical change. And it’s time Americans stop tripping on mere voting and think beyond just electoral politics for affecting change.

        Fascism, the corporate state and capitalism thrive on misinformed and divided citizens. Garden variety liberal voters who think solely ballots (for anyone, really, including Jones) are gonna stop this are dangerously mistaken.

        We and the planet are getting absolutely crushed by capitalism, the marriage of Big Capital to our political system, and the authoritarianism required to sustain that arrangement. This is nothing new. Nothing secret or deep state. It’s irrefutable.

        The common idea that social and political change are top-down phenomena, where specific elected “officials” and “authorities” pull the levers and benevolent public policy/programs/rights/priorities/wish fulfillments etc flow from the halls of power down to the masses is fundamentally flawed. The people have always had to TAKE them.

        Voting? Voting is like the LEAST a citizen can do for their communities and their country. It’s a 20-40 minute ritual every 2 odd years. Conducted in secret, under very controlled conditions. For mostly “experienced” insider options vetted first by the oligarchy. (That’s by design.)

        National electoral politics yields shifts and changes that are clearly wayyy too slow & incremental for averting jackboots kidnapping people in unmarked vans from our city streets, the U.S. military lining up to shoot you, forced birth, US sponsored genocide, child torture and neglect, climate disaster, these unending catastrophic wars, the prison and police state, did I mention kids languishing for years in for profit border captivity, 70 million jobless, 10 million facing eviction during a deadly pandemic with the UE supp tapped out, millions of families entering hunger and homelessness with no safety net, did I mention the US sponsored genocide in Gaza, nuclear proliferation, a massive surveillance state, a prison and police state, elders running out of money and affordable shelter and care as they age, and goddamn the public health disaster we found ourselves in with no public healthcare option. Another deadly destabilizing war against a nation that hasn’t attacked us. And did I mention climate disaster? West on fire again last year. 118 in the Arctic wtf

        Civilization, is at any given moment about 9 square meals away from chaos, instability, street wars, anarchy.

        (And while I opposed the motives, political aims and objectives, ideology and indoctrination behind the idiots who stormed the Capitol on January 6, I understand it. Riots are nothing but the unheard voices of the masses.)

        Power concedes nothing without a demand. Can’t vote our way out of this clusterfuck obviously. Idc how liberal or progressive voters think they are. Votes without direct action ain’t it. Internecine arguments and oppositional defiance on a blog ain’t it. Screeches of norm erosion ain’t it.

        The truth is that we need a massive labor movement in this country. Libs and Dems absolutely cannot say that they have rooted themselves in that message. There are receipts all over this media ecosystem.

        Waiting for power’s permission to let us run more “honest, trustworthy, reliable, sincere, competitive blah blah blah players and new parties” so we can one day take over an arcane and outdated senate or parliament and do it our way, is a damned fools errand.

        We are outta time. Planet on fire. Jackboots on our streets. World at war. Women can’t plan the size of their families. Thousands maybe near one million? powerless people turned into pink mist by a U.S. sponsored despot with his sack in Congress’ mouth. Endless arms to aggress on Russia. Genocide in Gaza spreading into south Lebanon. Iran. International rules based order in the toilet. Nuclear supers about to go at it.

        Power stems from the people. Organize. Radicalize you’re loved ones. Stand up and fight back.

        Vote sure. It’s important.
        And ballots never stopped fascism.
        Ask Weimar. Nor have Clintonian neoliberal economics, Reagan democrats, or blue dog rule. In fact, they enable fascism.

        Now is the time, well PAST the time for
        #mass general strikes
        #climatestrikes
        #debtstrikes
        #laborstrikes
        #taxstrikes
        #rentstrikes
        #boycotts
        #prosumerism
        #mutualaidsocieties

        G’nite

      2. 23 words about Eric Jones and 752 words that are not about Eric Jones. You don’t seem to realize how telling it is that you keep changing the subject away from him. He said things on social media? Great! Please share ONE link where has said something about what he would do with regard to military spending and Israel/Gaza. I am genuinely interested in seeing something concrete about where he stands on these and you seem to have the familiarity and the interest in supporting his campaign.

Leave a comment