Davisite Banner. Left side the bicycle obelisk at 3rd and University. Right side the trellis at the entrance to the Arboretum.

Four Million CA Households Fleeced for Utility Profits and Never-Ending Rate Hikes.

Objecting to cpuc

By Scott Steward

State leadership is about to let utilities gouge you. Three days before the end of the 2022 legislative session, legislators passed AB 205, a utility flat tax introduced by Newsom as a rider. The bill passed without public discussion.  

Now, the CPUC is allowing utilities to hit four million ratepayers with a $24/month utility tax. The hardest hit will be those with a small energy footprint, working families and seniors living in apartments and small homes, as well as people with rooftop solar. (Find out more about the STOP THE UTILITY TAX here). (CALL TO ACTION, MAY 9TH IN SACRAMENTO).

The Utility Tax will add to the pain that these four million households are already feeling from never-ending rate hikes, which have increased by over 30% in California in the last two years.

The CPUC is letting the utilities increase taxes, electricity, and gas rates without a cap, which means the pain will only get worse in the years to come. The $24/month tax is just the start. Utilities have made it clear that they intend to raise the utility tax to $80 a month or more.

More than 250 nonprofit groups and 20 legislators supported AB 1999, which would have capped the Utility Tax at a sensible $10/month and pegged any increases to inflation. But Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas pulled the bill out of the Assembly Utility and Energy Commission (that had the votes to pass the bill).

The California coalition for AB 1999 has repeatedly argued that the CPUC's Utility Tax will raise bills for working people and seniors and has already pummeled solar and energy conservation businesses, once a California success story. 

But Governor Newsom and Speaker Rivas chose to be utility mercenaries again and squashed the assembly bill before lawmakers could vote on it. Newsom and Rivas have been beholden to the utilities since they bailed out PG&E when PG&E went bankrupt after the Paradise fire. They had the public ownership option and instead used public money to bail out the utilities. Now, our reward is monopoly power, political graft, and a deliberate hit job on the flourishing renewable energy economy.

The California Senate has done no better. On their own volition, without the majority leader's influence, those lawmakers defeated a bill similar to AB 1999 that would have capped the Utility Tax (see how they voted on SB 1326). Dodd is on the Utilities and Energy Committee, and he voted SB 1326 down.

This fight is not over. The Legislature is in session through August and can pass laws to rein in the CPUC. The fact remains that four million households are going to be hurt by this Utility Tax and the outrage is sure to grow.

While we fight this, your city and County Climate Adaptation and Action Plans risk being undermined by contrived utility profit-driven inflation. Distributed renewable energy is more reliable and less profitable and for-profit utilities know it. Instead of acting on this reality, utilities have not made long-foreseen necessary investments in battery backup and grid network capacity that optimizes locally efficient and reliable power. Instead, they have spent $10 million dollars to fill state representative coffers and run campaigns to blame solar rooftops for the need to increase rates (this is part of a larger strategy to blame the solution to cover for-profit windfall and energy security negligence).

The utility-captured CPUC is holding its commissioner meeting in Sacramento on May 9th to "fix" the utility taxes and rates and hand over a windfall to the utilities. California's coalition of voter and equity groups is gathering next Thursday in Sacramento to let the CPUC know we are watching and to tell them you can't raise the basic cost of electricity by 250% for 4 million households.  

Register for the event and get more information on the May 9th Sacramento demonstration against the UTILITY TAX https://www.stoptheutilitytax.org/may9 

Call Your Senate Representative and Governor

CA Senator Bill Dodd  (who is on the Utilities and Energy Committee) did vote NO on SB 1326. It was a vote not to reverse the utility windfall tax.  You might let him know about this mistake and ask what his plans are to fix the situation.

Phone: (916) 651-4003

Governor Gavin Newsom: 916-445-2841

You might provide Newsom with the following:

Your public persona is that of a climate champion, but your continued support of the utilities reaping huge profits on the backs of ratepayers says otherwise. Your total disregard for ratepayers, who can no longer afford electricity and the democratic legislative process that has served California well for decades, is appalling. 

Do the right thing and allow AB 1999 to be heard. We know you are behind AB1999 being denied a fair and open hearing. We vote and we will not forget. 

Davisite logo

Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.

Comments

11 responses to “Four Million CA Households Fleeced for Utility Profits and Never-Ending Rate Hikes.”

  1. Ron O

    Well, one good thing about rate hikes is that folks will then use less of a (largely) non-renewable resource. (Supply/demand model.)
    Same thing is true if they raised the price of gas to $100/gallon. The higher the cost, the less demand there is for it. (A similar concept to “induced demand” via expanding freeways, I think.)
    (Yet another example of the difference between social equity concerns vs. environmental protection. Clearly, the environment benefits when the cost increases in such cases.
    The fixed fee is a different matter (and is the reason that environmental groups have differing views of this plan).

  2. Darell

    State leadership is about to let utilities gouge you. <<<
    Lost me on this one. This is merely the latest gouge.
    @Ron O. You saved it near the end there. A fixed fee is the opposite of reducing demand. I make more energy than I use. A fixed fee will do NOTHING to curb my consumption. It will merely act as a punitive fee that I can’t lower no matter how much less energy I use. This is not social equity vs environmental protection. I think you missed the part where customers who have their own solar systems are being the hardest hit with the recent pricing changes. It is a complicated mess with apparently not checks on it.

  3. Keith

    I agree with Darell. This is just an end around in order to gouge homeowners with solar and those that use less electricity. This bill has nothing to do with reducing consumption. Once the set fee is in place nothing will stop them from raising it even higher in the future.

  4. Keith

    Done. I’ve contacted my legislators. It seems like every time you turn around Democrats in this state are trying their slimy little tricks to get their grubby hands into our pocketbooks.

  5. Dan Cornford

    A recent story in the SF Chronicle stated that California now has the second highest utility rates in the country surpassed only by Hawaii, and I think I am correct in saying that PG & E’s rates are the highest of any major utility in the state. Even the SF Chron. and the SJ Mercury News (hardly anti-business newspapers) have run frequent articles of late highly critical of the CPUC and PG & E. Among the many obvious points noted are that PG & E is paying the price for refusing over many years, actually decades, to update its infrastructure while paying rich rewards to shareholders and at the same time being found legally at fault for several major CA fires. In addition, the CEO of PG & E, Patricia Poppe, is paid $17 million a year!
    If you look at Nextdoor occasionally, as I do, you see that a significant number of people on low-medium incomes have been badly affected. And yet the new round of rate raises and summer electricity bills have not taken effect yet. Be it the incredible stream of rate increases that PG & E has obtained in recent years or the proposed utility tax, I am amazed that in this so called progressive state that more people are not outraged. And that our supposedly progressive governor (who gets campaign contributions from PG & E—as do many Dem state legislators), and many state legislatures have thus far acted, in most cases, only tokenistically to try and control PG & E and the CPUC. It sometimes makes me wonder if I really live in a blue state.
    The Solar Alliance (based in San Diego) is holding a protest against the utility tax in Sacramento on May 9, 11-12PM. For more on their opposition to this tax go to this link: https://solarrights.org/utility-tax-post/?emci=d7256f5f-4d07-ef11-96f3-7c1e521b07f9&emdi=2ce8ea7c-9008-ef11-96f3-7c1e521b07f9&ceid=10549561. Sign up for their alerts as well. There are less than one a month.
    I could cite many articles or links from the above sources et al. I’ll confine it to one by Loretta Lynch, former CEO of the CPUC. It was published in the SF Chron on April 20, 2024. In the article she meticulously criticizes both the CPUC and PG & E. It’s really worth 5 minutes of your time:
    Here’s the real reason PG&E rates are skyrocketing in California
    By Loretta Lynch
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/california-electric-bills-news-puc-19410274.php
    And those of you who are apathetic or indifferent, remember that you and others will not really feels the effects of the CPUC’s and PG & Es work until the summer is here and you start having to run your AC.
    We need a ballot measure to make the CPUC an elected body, and not one whose members are appointed by our supposedly liberal Democratic governors, or one to “nationalize” the state major private utilities, as Governor Newsom threatened to do a few years ago.
    Finally, Scott, keep up the very good work!!!

  6. Ron O

    Darrell: Yes – I was only referring to the increase in rates, not the fixed fee or whatever is going on with customers who have their own solar system.
    But increases in rates is a social equity vs. environmental protection issue, as long as electricity is generated via non-renewable resources (or has other environmental impacts).
    Just as raising the cost of gasoline would benefit the environment, but would disproportionately impact “poor” people. And we’d all be paying $50 for a burrito, to which I say – so what? (More likely that a lot of low-wage jobs would simply disappear, and we’d have to make our own burritos -and pay more for the ingredients to be delivered.)
    Another related issue is the state’s continuing approval of massive growth/sprawl of cheaper housing in the hot valley (requiring the use of air conditioning), vs. those who remain in the more-moderate climate near the coast. This also results in “poor people” using more energy to cool their homes (and increased motor vehicle usage). Very few people even have air conditioning in places like San Francisco.
    Of course, “someone” has to pay for the intrusion of housing in high-risk fire zones. Or as they say, “Paradise Strong” – which will continue as long as others pay for that.

  7. Ron O

    “It sometimes makes me wonder if I really live in a blue state.”
    The high cost confirms that you live in a blue state.
    But again, can’t stress this enough: It costs a fortune to maintain/bury power lines. And those communities will ultimately catch fire by some other method, regardless. (Perhaps even from individual solar systems, lightning, etc.)
    I am not convinced that this is primarily PG&E’s “fault”. Again, they’re apparently REQUIRED to charge the same rate to all locales, regardless of risk/cost.
    “Paradise Strong”
    The same type of meddling by the state has caused insurance companies to stop issuing/renewing policies (directly), leaving the state’s “Fair Plan” as the only alternative. (Which actually consists of insurance companies behind that plan.)
    https://www.bankrate.com/insurance/homeowners-insurance/california-fair-plan/

  8. Scott

    California PUC Considers New Fixed Charge for Electricity
    KQED Forum
    Loretta Lynch, former President, California Public Utilities Commission
    Ben Christopher, reporter, CalMatters
    https://www.kqed.org/forum/2010101905607/california-puc-considers-new-fixed-charge-for-electricity

  9. Scott

    Public Pressure forces Leadership to Back Off Handing Utilities Uncapped Fee/Tax Capabilities – – support for AB1999 compromise needs your help.
    Assembly Member Irwin (author of AB 1999) and Speaker Rivas made a compromise for the new version of AB 1999 that caps the Utility Tax at $24 a month. This is a “better” compromise that limits increases to inflation and sunsets the tax after three years. That means it can only rise with the cost of inflation and cannot jump to $70 or $100 a month without legislation, and puts the whole process in the public eye.
    For our Yolo voters, call the Chair; Asm Buffy Wicks (916) 319-2014
    Script: Dear Assembly member … my name is …………I am a Californian rate payer
    I am asking you to vote YES for AB 1999. This, for you, is a career defining moment . Are you with utility profits or ratepayers pocketbooks? We have compromised at $24 a month. It’s still twice the national utility tax average and will still harm millions of ratepayers but we have accepted Speaker Rivas’ compromise. Let’s pass this and move on.

  10. Keith

    So the tax(?) is going up 140% and we’re supposed to be happy about that?
    That’s how it often works, threaten a much higher tax then get the sheep to feel happy that they only raised it 140%.
    Does this new compromise(?) also have new lower kWh rates?

Leave a comment