Davisite logo
Davisite Banner. Left side the bicycle obelisk at 3rd and University. Right side the trellis at the entrance to the Arboretum.

<

>

Al’s Corner – January –> 2024 is Going to Suck – Probably a Nuke Will be Detonated – “Though we do go after the Vanguard on here”

image from www.sparkysonestop.com

I'm tired of being optimistic about the new year.  Since Covid-19, we've all hoped the next new year would bring better times, but each subsequent year since 2020 has sucked, culminating with the October 7th Invasion & War and Increased Hatred of Groups of People.  And our City Council ?  NOT HELPING.

People suck.

But, as R.O. says:  "we do go after the Vanguard on here".  And that is the most important thing — even more important than world peace.

Some annoying woketivist reminded me that David Greenwald was living rent-free in my head.  So I informed DG that I'm now charging him $3000/mo for rent. 

2024 will undoubtedly suck more than 2023.  I also believe some angry narcissist is going to set off a nuke in 2024.  That'll make the argument over who called in the Davis bomb threats moot.  Stock up on iodine, folks!

SUBJECT:  "Editor’s Note: The Good, the Bad and the Ridiculous"  [2day's vansplard]

Well, 2023 ended with a boom. 
 
I predict 2024 will also end with a boom.  Only long before the end of the year.  Iodine, folks.
 
The good news in the last six days the Vanguard raised $13,000. 
 
"Good" is a value judgement.
 
WS say:  "It’s actual science Beth, but your own experiences have blinded you to that widely recognized fact."
 
Taking a break in the middle of the article.  The last vestige of woke-ism:  "It's science"  Actually, science is a process of challenge, theory and confirmation, not a religion of a set facts.  And now back to our regularly featured tearing apart of things written in the Vanguard:
 

Spike the ball.  Live to fight another day.

Hopefully just a day, if we're lucky.

The bad news… that just gets us through the payroll this month.

"Bad" is a judgement call.

I remember when $13,000 would set us up nicely for a few months.  Now it’s barely a month.  That’s ridiculous but at the same time, it’s okay.

It's okay?  What's okay?  Horrible, society-killing inflation?  "Okay" then.

We’re on the verge of doing some great stuff this year. 

Sounds like y'all are also on the verge of running out of cash.

The biggest news coming into the new year is that we are working to launch (finally) our new website. 

Oh goody.  "Finally" — You can say that again.   Of course, now that I'm banned and the comments are a woke suckfest echo-chamber (plus KO for as long as he lasts), I don't give a flying fuck that the edit feature might actually work before it times out.  Which is all I ever asked.  Oh that and a new moderator.  But a website format fix, well, it won't fix that.

This will be our first new website since 2014. 

Seems longer ago than that.

I have seen the prototype for it and it looks nice and clean.

I can't wait not to use it.

The continued Vanguard Court Watch and what that program means not only for the Vanguard but for all the interns—all three of them had formerly been interns and soon all three will be in law school.

Just what we need, more indoctrinated, woketivist lawyers.

The rolling out of our prison watch internship where we will be taking the concept of the court watch and helping to train incarcerated people in journalism.

"We" ?  Who is the "we" that will be doing this training?  Intern future lawyers?  Prison guards ?  Prison "Van" guards ?

Our future high school journalism training program where we will be taking inner city kids and helping them go to college by training them in journalism, the law, and writing.

You will be teaching writing to young people?  Seriously?  Is this The Onion?  The Babylon Bee?   The irony police called and they want all of your English teachers incarcerated for the harm done to your readers.  After awhile, we all become just a little bit worse writers ourselves:  "Trickle down" immigrammatical exposure.  But of course, your future woketivist lawyers will decarcerate your English teachers.  So it'll all be alright.

I pause to thank all of you who donated in 2023 and especially those who helped in the critical drive down the stretch—you made this all possible.

Yeah, thanks, Butt Heads.  What were you thinking?

It should be a fun year. 

That's one prediction.  I'm predicting the detonation of a nuke –> "half glass full, half glass empty" – Tanya Harding

We’ll be firing up the old fund drive soon enough. 

Does it run on diesel ?  Does CARB still let you run it?

If you want to help, however, you can become a monthly donor, a sustaining member

Or you can jam your foot in the door and demand tax records.

Iodine, folks.  Iodine.

Posted by

Alan C. Miller

on

in

, ,
Davisite logo

Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.

Comments

70 responses to “Al’s Corner – January –> 2024 is Going to Suck – Probably a Nuke Will be Detonated – “Though we do go after the Vanguard on here””

  1. Ron O

    Speaking of “going after the Vanguard”, I’ll repost a couple of comments below from the December “corner”, per Al’s suggestion. (They don’t automatically appear, when comments reach more than 100.)

    From today’s “give me money” article, in the Vanguard:
    David: “I remember when $13,000 would set us up nicely for a few months. Now it’s barely a month.
    That’s ridiculous but at the same time, it’s okay.”
    I can think of some much better words (than “okay”) to describe this, in regard to the Vanguard’s stated guiding principles.

    Reply
  2. Ron O

    I see the following comment from Beth on DJUSD’s Facebook page:
    “Happy New Year, 2024 is going to be a great one ♥️💙♥️
    Superintendent Matt Best and DJUSD Trustees,
    please schedule a community ‘study session’ on gender identity policies, activities, and curriculum in the k-12 schools before the March vote on Measure N, the new $800 school parcel tax.”
    I bolded the text that I find amusing, since I already noted something similar (but from DJUSD’s perspective): That is, those associated with DJUSD are likely trying to tie-in “trans rights” with support for Measure N.
    With the implication that you must be “anti-trans” if you don’t support Measure N.
    My guess is that this is a winning strategy, for DJUSD.
    (Not sure who, exactly, is behind the “Davis is for Everyone” signs around the city.)

    Reply
  3. Keith

    I see David and the Vanguard are reporting that they raised payroll just in a nick of time. We can all breathe easier now. I think Alan’s $1 donation put them over the top.

    Reply
  4. Alan C. Miller

    My $1 donation to the Vansplard was for cranial-rectal detachment surgery.
    RO say: “Not sure who, exactly, is behind the “Davis is for Everyone” signs around the city.”
    I’m sure glad Davis is for Everyone. There was a moment there, #phew!# that I thought Davis was not for conservatives.

    Reply
  5. Ron O

    I’m sure glad Davis is for Everyone. There was a moment there, #phew!# that I thought Davis was not for conservatives.
    There’s a reason that there’s “rails” that go from Davis to Woodland. All the better to run them out of town, on. Tied-up and wearing signs, stating that there’s more than two genders.
    Though truth be told, I don’t think that Woodland is all that different from Davis these days. (Some from the Davis Phoenix Coalition appear to be at work there, as well.)

    Reply
  6. South of Davis

    I’m told that if you look at the back of all the “Davis is for Everyone” signs they say “That agrees with Us”. P.S. I wonder when we will start to see these new “coexist” bumper stickers in town?
    https://babylonbee.com/news/liberals-release-new-coexist-sticker-with-star-of-david-replaced-by-paraglider

    Reply
  7. catherine L portman

    Really?! This is what the Davisite is about?

    Reply
  8. Alan C. Miller

    CLP say: “Really?! This is what the Davisite is about?”
    Yes 😐 Disgusting isn’t it? But that’s not all “we” are about: we are also very critical of Dan Carson’s ties with Davis real estate peeps, and we also do reviews on smoked fish such as lox and sheep.
    No, “we” aren’t about anything. It’s just a random shit show.
    Welcome, CLP, to “our” world. “We” hope you will continue to submit.
    [Note: The comments made by Al’s Corner do not necessarily reflect those of the board or management of The Davisite, or it’s sponsors, of which there are none]

    Reply
  9. Keith

    “Really?! This is what the Davisite is about?”
    Just like “Davis is for Everyone” Al’s Corner is for everyone regardless of your political views and your comments will always get posted as long as you don’t break any rules (unlike another blog in Davis).
    Maybe Alan can get some signs made and stick them on lawns everywhere.
    “Al’s Corner is for Everyone”

    Reply
  10. Alan C. Miller

    Actually the t-shirts would say, “Al’s Corner is for Everyone, Except for One Person, and You Know Who You Are, You Little Piece of Shit”

    Reply
  11. Keith

    Today’s Vanguard article: “Commentary: 2024 Emerges with Housing Back on the Forefront of Community Concerns”
    Well knock me over with a feather. The Vanguard is writing about housing. It emerged folks. It’s back on the forefront. I’m shocked!

    Reply
  12. Alan C. Miller

    Housing on the forefront ?
    Hmmm . . . makes me wonder where that $16,000 came from :-0

    Reply
  13. Ron O

    I had a strong suspicion that the Vanguard would switch from “burying Beth” back to the fake housing shortage, today.
    The fake housing shortage is the Vanguard’s bread-and-butter.

    Reply
  14. Roberta L. Millstein

    Catherine Portman asks: Really?! This is what the Davisite is about?
    No, that isn’t what the Davisite is about. But often Alan Miller is motivated to write about it, and some regular commenters are motivated to write about it too.
    Lately, I’ve not been motivated to write about any topic, and also in the last couple of weeks I have received fewer things to post — which happens every year around this time. (It’s like there are holidays or something?)
    So, now that it is 2024 (happy new year!), this is an invite to you, Catherine, and to others, to send articles to the Davisite to post.

    Reply
  15. Ron O

    I am starting to see some price cuts for existing housing in Davis (and throughout the state). (I like to look at Zillow listings.)
    In any case, if I was looking to buy a house in Davis, I’d definitely be looking at the following example. (I don’t have any connection to this listing, or any other listing.)
    But yeah, if you can’t afford $720K for a very decent house, I’m not sure what to tell you. A lot better than whatever complicated shell game that Covell Village is planning.
    https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2908-Prado-Ln-Davis-CA-95618/16545128_zpid/

    Reply
  16. Ron O

    So, now that it is 2024 (happy new year!), this is an invite to you, Catherine, and to others, to send articles to the Davisite to post.
    And “Al’s Corner” invites those who either don’t have enough content to write an article, or are simply too lazy to do so. (I meet “both” of these qualifications.)
    Or, to react to the Vanguard or other local articles/issues without getting attacked or unnecessarily “moderated”.
    “AL” welcomes “ALL”. (Even “AI”, in the form of ChatGPT.)

    Reply
  17. Keith

    “AL” welcomes “ALL”.
    I like that, “All’s Corner”.

    Reply
  18. Alan C. Miller

    RM say: “No, that isn’t what the Davisite is about. But often Alan Miller is motivated to write about it, and some regular commenters are motivated to write about it too.”
    I actually don’t know what the “it” being referred to is. Was it smoked fish sheep?
    Whatever it is, RM, maybe the Davisite should change our business model. I was thinking maybe we could solicit real estate developers and social justice warrior lawyers for money, and that would help pay for a new website, and then we could “hire” #cough/cough# “interns” and “volunteers” and “staff” who we could “teach” “writing” and shape into politically far-left activists who we could send out into the work world to infiltrate the media and law profession and HR departments with a goal of decarceration and “defunding” the police?
    What do you think? Shouldn’t take too much time or effort. Let’s discuss it at the upcoming Davisite shareholders meeting in Barbados.

    Reply
  19. Alan C. Miller

    KO say “I like that, “All’s Corner”.”
    Yeah, when smoked fish sheep fly, maybe.

    Reply
  20. Keith

    “What do you think? Shouldn’t take too much time or effort. Let’s discuss it at the upcoming Davisite shareholders meeting in Barbados.”
    Picture my hand in the air. Can I be a Davisite Executive Board member and go with you guys? I’m an old boomer but can be fun. I promise not to wear Speedos.

    Reply
  21. Roberta L. Millstein

    ACM writes:
    RM say: “No, that isn’t what the Davisite is about. But often Alan Miller is motivated to write about it, and some regular commenters are motivated to write about it too.”
    I actually don’t know what the “it” being referred to is. Was it smoked fish sheep?
    It = the Vanguard
    ACM continues:
    Whatever it is, RM, maybe the Davisite should change our business model. I was thinking maybe we could solicit real estate developers and social justice warrior lawyers for money, and that would help pay for a new website, and then we could “hire” #cough/cough# “interns” and “volunteers” and “staff” who we could “teach” “writing” and shape into politically far-left activists who we could send out into the work world to infiltrate the media and law profession and HR departments with a goal of decarceration and “defunding” the police?
    What do you think? Shouldn’t take too much time or effort. Let’s discuss it at the upcoming Davisite shareholders meeting in Barbados.
    Sounds like a plan.

    Reply
  22. R Keller

    For this plan: don’t forget the basic Vanguard business model of generating multiple articles per day through blatant plagiarizing and faking dateline locations! You can do this through “repurposing” articles written by actual news organizations or by simply re-printing press releases while not identifying them as such. Easy-peasy!

    Reply
  23. Ron O

    But of course, your future woketivist lawyers will decarcerate your English teachers.
    English needs to be cancelled. It is, after all, the language of the colonizers.
    (Just going along with the program.)

    Reply
  24. South of Davis

    R. Keller wrote:

    don’t forget the basic Vanguard business model of generating
    multiple articles per day through blatant plagiarizing
    I just read that someone who is perfect for the Vanguard will be looking for a new job:
    “Harvard’s Gay Resigns Following New Allegations Of Plagiarism”
    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/harvards-gay-hit-new-plagiarism-allegations-widespread-double-standards-exposed-elite

    Reply
  25. Ron O

    Harvard’s Gay
    Had to click on the link, to ensure that I wasn’t misunderstanding that reference.
    I’m trying to think of a comment which is amusing, but won’t get me in trouble. Then again, what I find amusing is probably not a universal standard.
    I’m pretty much at the Family Guy level, and probably won’t “mature” beyond that.

    Reply
  26. Ron O

    I’m submitting this comment for the sole purpose of ensuring that my previous comment is not hanging-around as the last comment (out there on a limb) for an extended period of time.
    🙂
    I suppose I could also say something about the Vanguard and housing, but it’s all been said before. (For sure, I could see the renewed push coming in advance, as interest in Beth-bashing wanes.)

    Reply
  27. Alan C. Miller

    I feel that it is my duty and a public service to report that there is a housing article in the Davis Vanguard today. Please stop whatever you are doing and go read it.
    It is the 3rd day of the year, and already there are: wait for it — three articles on the housing “crisis”. Tomorrow – four ???
    I think we should build housing. I’ve voted for each of the Measure J projects, except for the Carson Express. I’m in favor of building large buildings in the downtown core.
    But I’m not voting for any more Measure J projects. Because of David Greenwald and his weird obsession with housing while allowing deletion of comments thus making his blog a joke, Dan Carson, the developers who hired Dan Carson while he was on the City Council, Scott Weiner and his housing laws, and Gavin Newsom, who will probably be President, God help us, and then these housing overreaches will go national! Vice President Weiner anyone?
    Also my now voting NO on everything is in protest to Measure J itself, which is a stupid law.
    Anyway, I’ve joined Our Neighborhood Voices. They are like the anti-Weiner. They are against these overreaches. Even though our Council is too pro-developer-no-matter-what-because-of-the-housing-crisis, at least what we need is local control of development back, instead of the state sticking it’s arm into our loo.
    Our Neighborhood Voices!!!! Go Team Rah Rah Shiiiish Boooom Bahhh!!!!

    Reply
  28. Ron O

    Thought I’d see what 48 Hills is reporting, regarding Wiener and the other housing Nazis.
    The argument is politically solid: The state is threatening to take away funding for essential city services, including affordable housing, and take away almost all local land-use controls, if developers don’t build a huge amount of new market-rate housing in San Francisco—but developers aren’t building much of anything right now, and the city can’t force them to.
    The Planning Commission and the supes have already passed all of the “constraint reduction” bills the state asked for. That’s all they can do.
    “We cannot force developers to build and yet new legislation would seek to penalize San Francisco anyway,” the letter states.
    https://48hills.org/2024/01/peskin-chan-want-to-know-if-sf-can-sue-the-state-over-impossible-housing-rules/
    (Seems to me that the REAL question is how does Wiener remain in office? Do voters just “automatically” select the only “Democrat”?)
    Honestly, I’d ask that about the Davis city council, as well. They clearly support developments that voters at large (often) do not. Let alone trying to take-away Measure J.

    Reply
  29. Alan C. Miller

    MODERATOR WATCH
    Ω A New Al’s Corner Exclusive Feature Ω
    From 2day’s Yavish Yanguard:
    Moderator January 3, 2024 at 5:47 pm
    The insults need to stop, folks.
    Al Corner say: Unless the insults are against people you personally dislike.

    Reply
  30. Alan C. Miller

    There’s an article on housing in the Davis Vanguard this morning, if anyone gives a flying fuck.

    Reply
  31. Ron O

    There’s an article on housing in the Davis Vanguard this morning, if anyone gives a flying fuck.
    Yeah, and it’s full of misleading statements.
    It’s written by someone from “Interfaith Housing Justice Davis”. Which makes me wonder why they didn’t single out the churches in Davis which don’t want housing on “their” tax-free land.
    https://www.davisvanguard.org/2023/12/letter-catholic-church-opposes-housing-on-montgomery-blvd-site/
    (I think there was more than one article, and more than one church which objected to rezoning. I’d ask if tax-free church land is exempt from rezoning, when no other land is.)

    Reply
  32. Ron O

    Just skimmed through the Vanguard article I referenced above, and noticed this:
    Legal Services of Northern California argued that there is an overconcentration of proposed sites in this area. We agree.
    Isn’t Legal Services the same organization that’s making an implied threat regarding Measure J?
    And yet, they’re siding with the referenced church in opposition to rezoning their land to accommodate housing?
    Something stinks around here, and it isn’t Measure J.

    Reply
  33. Alan C. Miller

    SUBJECT: “COURT WATCH: Judge Denies Release for Homeless Man, Who’s Desperate to Visit Dying Brother” [2day’s Avis Anguard]
    marlena martinez January 4, 2024 at 4:32 am
    . . . This judge is heartless. If I was that guy and this happened to me. Everyone better stay out my way. Bc I would be a ticking time bomb . . .
    And this is what happens when a ticket time bomb that doesn’t like a judge’s ruling, goes off:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LbBxEyW_9w
    That leap was Olympian! There are longer versions for context.

    Reply
  34. Ron O

    David is putting forth the usual falsehoods regarding housing in the Vanguard, today:
    “. . . council members in the last few months have noted that Davis cannot address its housing needs with just infill—and we all know that peripheral housing means a Measure J vote at this time and that could be its own mess.”
    Again, San Francisco (and just about every other locale along the coast) is NOT expanding outward in regard to RHNA targets. It’s that simple.
    But David continues to put forth a theory that the state will “view” Davis differently than these other locales, simply because there is farmland outside of city limits (which in David’s mind, is ripe for sprawl). NOTHING in state law provides the state with authority to do so, nor was it the original intent of the state to promote sprawl.
    In any case, it’s certainly nice to see that some of San Francisco’s representatives have had enough, and are seeking to sue the state over impossible targets.
    Per the link in David’s article (to 48 Hills):
    The argument is politically solid: The state is threatening to take away funding for essential city services, including affordable housing, and take away almost all local land-use controls, if developers don’t build a huge amount of new market-rate housing in San Francisco—but developers aren’t building much of anything right now, and the city can’t force them to.
    The Planning Commission and the supes have already passed all of the “constraint reduction” bills the state asked for. That’s all they can do.
    One of the supervisors said this, regarding Wiener’s response:
    ” . . . an argument “from a senator who hates his own Senate district.”
    Exactly. And it’s not difficult to see that Wiener is failing to force housing, and is also creating enemies in his own district. This is not a winning political strategy.
    This is not going to end well for the state. Very few cities, if any, will actually meet the state’s targets.

    Reply
  35. Alan C. Miller

    Until the State ends this top-down land-use control and returns the power to local control, I am voting against all Measure J projects.

    Reply
  36. Ron O

    Kind of disappointed – no new housing advocacy article in the Vanguard, today.
    I’m revved-up, and ready to take them on. Did they run out of gas this early in the new year?
    At this rate, they’ll never even manage to get a measure on the ballot, in their attempt to overturn Measure J.
    Personally, I think they should try to overturn Measure J while they SIMULTANEOUSLY try to win approval under Measure J for Covell Village, Act II.
    In other words, go for a “two-fer” on the same ballot. Try to win one way, or the other. Or both ways.
    And have Scott Wiener count the ballots.

    Reply
  37. MT

    Developers own the council, own local influencers, own the activists.. davis is a hotbed of corruption at taxpayer expense.

    Reply
  38. Alan C. Miller

    MT say: “Developers own the council, own local influencers, own the activists.. davis is a hotbed of corruption at taxpayer expense.”
    Developers don’t own Al’s Corner.
    And I don’t think they own the Davisite, either, but I don’t turn the big knobs. Maybe Roberta could confirm — do developers own the Davisite?

    Reply
  39. Roberta L. Millstein

    Correct, developers neither own nor contribute money to the Davisite.

    Reply
  40. Alan C. Miller

    So, “Developers own the council, own local influencers, own the activists.. “ in Davis, but “developers neither own nor contribute money to the Davisite”.
    Therefore, it stands to reason that the Davisite is an ultra-moral brilliant gleaming light of integrity in Davis, and all Davis residents should genuflect at the alter of our righteousness.

    Reply
  41. Roberta L. Millstein

    Clearly. Either that, or we’re neither influencers nor activists.

    Reply
  42. Alan C. Miller

    Well, we’re certainly not developers nor councilmembers 😐

    Reply
  43. Alan C. Miller

    Lead Headline in Davis Vanguard today:
    “2024 Figures To Be a Challenging Year To Make Progress on Housing”
    OH MY GOD! CALL OUT THE MARINES!!!

    Reply
  44. Keith

    “2024 Figures To Be a Challenging Year To Make Progress on Housing”
    At this point does anyone actually read these Vanguard housing articles anymore? How many ways can the Vanguard spin and repeat the same old shit day after day? Once I see the monotonous headline I don’t bother to read the article. Instead I head straight to the comments but that’s a graveyard too these days.

    Reply
  45. Ron O

    From today’s Vanguard housing article (as referenced by Alan M.):
    David: “To me, this is the real problem. We need to address housing, homelessness, and poverty in California. These problems are leading to declining population which is making the problems even more difficult to address.”
    The first sentence is in direct conflict with the second sentence. Obviously, if the population is declining, housing becomes more available.
    This basic lack of logic is inherent in all of David’s housing advocacy, but he is unfortunately not alone in (purposefully?) refusing to acknowledge it. In fact, this type of outlook is driving state policy – largely as a result of business interests who meddle in state politics.
    Same issue regarding schools, also cited in that article. Declining enrollment itself is not a “problem” to be fixed. Instead, it’s the oversized school system that needs fixing.
    Schools exist to serve communities, not the other-way around. Why is this concept so difficult for some to grasp?

    Reply
  46. Keith

    “Moderator January 7, 2024 at 11:30 am
    Hi Walter,
    We’ve edited your comment. We won’t allow ‘NIMBY’ any more.”
    After 7000 “NIMBY” pejoratives allowed (I know, I counted them) the Vanguard has now decided not to allow the use of that acronym anymore. I know personally I’ve been called that 503 times (I know, I counted them).

    Reply
  47. Keith

    “By David M. Greenwald
    Executive Editor
    I am told that NIMBY is a pejorative. It also seems like an apt description of what is going on.”
    https://www.davisvanguard.org/2022/03/commentary-nimbyism-rears-its-ugly-head/
    So David defended the term NIMBY as an “apt description of what is going on” but now the term is taboo on the Vanguard. One never knows the day to day rules on the Vanguard.

    Reply
  48. Ron O

    “I know personally I’ve been called that 503 times (I know, I counted them).”
    O.K. (fellow) boomer!
    Avocado toast, anyone?

    Reply
  49. Alan C. Miller

    SUBJECT: “After Judge Overrules Jury to Send Man to Death, Alabama Plans to be 1st in Nation to Execute Someone with Hydrogen Gas” [2day’s Evis Enguard]
    OH THE HUMANITY !!!

    Reply
  50. Alan C. Miller

    “Hi, I’m DJ Al Corner. Looks like they’re having a comment-free Tuesday over at radio KDVG, and no comments yet today. Yep, folks they may be going for a Two-Fer! Somebody, quick, contact DJ DG and have one of their unpaid radio interns make a fake post under a fake name to prove me wrong!

    Reply

Leave a reply to Ron O Cancel reply