Davisite Banner. Left side the bicycle obelisk at 3rd and University. Right side the trellis at the entrance to the Arboretum.

Political Spam & a Revised Davis Ballot Flyer

By Alan Hirsch

This is my revised ballot flyer (see below) posted earlier here and on the Facebook Group Davis Ballot Talk.  I have changed my endorsement for US Senator to Adam Schiff from Katie Porter.  Porter has taken the unprecedented move of selling her donors list PRE-Election, the most assured way to create spam to her donors.

In the political world there is an awareness of donor annoyance with spam-but it’s the tragedy of common’s playing out.

This intel comes courtesy of Vera Sandronsky (my wife) who has studied the issue and written in the Enterprise about other ways to give politically- i.e. non-candidate giving –  It will likely be more effective and reduce spam: give to grass root groups building local civic involvement infrastructure (like Sister District, Indivisible, Walk the Walk, etc.)  instead of pop-up candidate efforts that appear and go away bi-annually.

But even for candidate giving changes are coming, and donors have choices…

I share below from Halley Bash’s  of Donor Hub newsletter : –

“We all know firsthand that our inboxes and phones are flooded with fundraising asks from candidates and PACs whose lists we've never signed up for.

“It's common practice for campaigns to sell and swap donor data after their election is over, but Rep. Katie Porter has now set the precedent of selling donor data in advance of the March 5 California Senate primary election.  Politico reported this on Friday.

“What does this mean?

  • Expect even more unsolicited fundraising emails and texts in Q2-Q4 than you've already been receiving in Q1
  • If you fundraise for candidates, it is worth considering adding the option for donors not to share their contact information with them via ActBlue. Steps on how to do that can be found here.
  • Some donors who want to donate to candidates and not get political fundraising spam are now ditching ActBlue and using Oath for their political donations, which by default does not share donor contact info with campaigns.

“This is a major betrayal of Porter’s supporters that directly contradicts her well-earned reputation as a consumer advocate. If a corporation sold its customer data in exactly the same manner, Congresswoman Porter would rightfully take it to task for exploiting consumer privacy. Donors to political campaigns deserve better than to have their contact information sold off without their knowledge or consent. I suspect that Congresswoman Porter agrees.”

“Josh Nelson is the CEO of Civic Shout, which helps Democratic campaigns and progressive nonprofits grow their opt-in email and SMS lists. He played a pivotal role in pushing back against Gmail’s pilot program to allow political campaigns to send spam email, and has helped lead the fight to pressure technology vendors to crack down on spam and scam fundraising tactics. He has repeatedly praised Rep. Porter’s leadership in the fight against fraudulent fundraising emails.”

Download Davis Neighborhood Ballot Rec v4 2 page 2024 03 05

Davis Neighborhood Ballot Rec v4 2 page 2024 03 05 hi00001

Davis Neighborhood Ballot Rec v4 2 page 2024 03 05 hi00002

Davisite logo

Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.

Comments

3 responses to “Political Spam & a Revised Davis Ballot Flyer”

  1. Luanna Villanueva

    Simply by registering to vote opens you up to political spam emails. Candidates purchase voter registration information from county election offices.

  2. Ron O

    Regarding the claim that Davis does not have a “strong property tax base”, tell that to all of the folks who bought houses within the last few years.
    The flyer then goes on to state that UCD (which isn’t in the city in the first place) pays no property tax. No shit, Sherlock.
    And then it states that the DJUSD parcel tax is just a “redo” of the current tax (it’s not), bringing up the “culture war” (in a seeming-attempt to convince people to vote yes), and (to top it off) claiming that home values will “fall” if that tax isn’t passed. Which (if true) means that “regular” property taxes will rise to their full amount allowed under Proposition 13, in ADDITION to the parcel tax. A double-loser, as it were.

  3. Lee Ann D’Amato

    Rozzana Verder-Aliga has no positive accomplishments. She was the board president of the Vallejo School Board when they had to be taken over by the state for eight years! They had to close an elementary school, and cut arts programs and counselors.
    I was on the board with her at the beginning and I know her. She fired the great superintendent that we hired. Lost over 60 million dollars. So either she was not doing her job or she knew about the mismanagement and malfeasance and looked the other way. Either way she wasn’t doing her job.
    Now she is Vice Mayor and the police department is so corrupt the state has also stepped in and taken it over. Please research her and vote no.

Leave a reply to Lee Ann D’Amato Cancel reply