Davisite Banner. Left side the bicycle obelisk at 3rd and University. Right side the trellis at the entrance to the Arboretum.

Parking-Free Projects in Core Doesn’t Mean those Residents Won’t Have Cars

This article regards Rich Rifkin’s article today in the Enterprise “Car-free downtown housing will benefit Davis”, at https://www.davisenterprise.com/forum/car-free-downtown-housing-will-benefit-davis/article_a4c63d0c-7531-4ffb-a6bd-0745b9007777.html for those of you who can break through the paywall, possibly by paying.

“Don’t build car parking spaces and they won’t come”. Pure fantasy. I live three blocks from the ACE project. I have no driveway so we have to park in the street. There are several similar properties nearby, mainly on corners. When the Capitol Corridor grew to a certain level and the parking lot reached critical mass, the cars overflowed en masse into our neighborhood. Yes, the project to keep cars off the road overflowed mass quantities of cars into our residential neighborhood.

I spearheaded a parking district that was implemented, but it took two years. We balanced this to allow open parking most of the time, but just enough to deal with Amtrak parking. There were times I couldn’t park within two blocks of my residence, again no driveway.

Now with ACE coming, we may have to redesign the parking district to keep the neighborhood from filling up at night. Simply declaring no parking does not mean people without cars will move in. As you know there is a huge business in Davis of people who rent out driveways and other spaces to students and others who can’t park. Also, these hundreds of residents will have visitors some of whom will drive. They will park in our neighborhoods.

The parking-free projects will reach a critical mass just like the Amtrak station did, and suddenly the parking districts as-designed won’t work anymore as these (dream on) ‘car free’ residents and their visitors park in our neighborhoods. Those most impacted, by far, will be those closest to project with insufficient parking-district protections. Old East and Huntwood neighborhoods between 5th and 8th will be adjacent to hundreds of carless (not really) residents who will park their non-existent cars and those of their visitors in an area with, currently at least, no parking district.

Also, all those alternative methods of transportation you (Rifkin) tout are wreaking havoc on Davis. Scooters, electric bikes and motorcycles are riding fast and in new patterns that involve riding on roads, bike paths, bike lanes and sidewalks in any direction. Discussing Davis with people, this is among the top concerns in Davis, and no one seems to have even an idea of a solution, and there is near-zero enforcement by UCD or City police.

Also, there are serious parking safety issues downtown already from Uber and Door Dash drivers who simply pull into the bike lane, turn on their hazard lights, swing their door open often without looking for bikes going around them that they just blocked, and taking up that space for as long as they want. Again, near-zero enforcement. Again, major issue for Davis and no solutions, and also a parking issue downtown.

People such as yourself (Rifkin) propose zero-parking projects as if having no parking means the people will have no cars and no visitors. Yes, on average fewer cars per resident, still more cars downtown and in central neighborhoods, and when this reaches critical mass, our neighborhoods will suddenly be impacted. I know how this happens, suddenly. I’ve been through it.

You won’t find a person who believes in and wants improved public and alternative transit than myself, and I’ve fought for this both as a private citizen my entire life and taken this as a career path. But the solution is building the infrastructure first, and maintaining it! Not fantasy ‘zero parking means zero cars’ projects.

With the state of many Davis roads in deterioration to the point bicycling can be hazardous, Thompson’s praise of Davis as a bicycle Mecca is borderline deranged. Politicians should stop praising themselves for a City that no longer should be proud of itself for being an innovator on bicycling, and instead go into emergency mode to prioritize fixing its streets and bike paths, and also come up with solutions on how to handle infrastructure and enforcement to make these new, heavy, fast ‘last mile’ modes part of the solution instead of new hazards.

Davisite logo

Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.

Comments

10 responses to “Parking-Free Projects in Core Doesn’t Mean those Residents Won’t Have Cars”

  1. Lynn Blumenstein

    People in bigger cities have gotten used to paying for long term in nearby garages. There’s one a couple of blocks away from this development.

    1. Alan C. Miller

      Three projects were mentioned: Sweetbriar, Hibberts, ACE. Regardless, do any of them have agreements for long-term parking for residents? My understanding is Hibberts had an agreement with the structure across the street long-ago before the project went dormant for awhile. Not sure that is still in place — anyone? You can’t simply park your car long-term without the ability to do so.

      1. A note on the G street garage you mention. currently it has public parking, but the cities lease expires at some point. replacing the city lease with more lucrative resident parking seems like something the property owner might like to do. end result though is less public parking downtown.

  2. Peter Buggy

    It is a leap of logic and common sense to assume that those who occupy housing with no parking will not have cars. There is no reason why these developments could not include underground parking. Yes it costs a bit more but practically speaking it would be worth it.

    1. Alan C. Miller

      It costs one heck of a lot more, plus you need space for the access ramps and gate, and in smaller projects such as Sweetbriar there simply isn’t enough space. Plus, you will almost certainly run into toxics issues digging in former industrial sites adjacent to or near railroad tracks. This adds a potentially extreme additional cost and an unknown timeline.

  3. Jay

    I agree many of the residents of these developments will have cars, and the lack of parking will have widespread impacts. For some real life examples, the Plaza 2555 apartments at the corner of Cowell and Research Park was built with an inadequate amount of on-site parking (I don’t have the numbers of units/bedrooms/residents, or the number of parking spaces). As a result, the parking regularly overflows into the Playfields parking lot and north on Research Park around the curve to where it runs next to I-80. Similarly residents of Via Verde, Windmere Apartments and Walnut Terraces appear to be overflow parking in the Explorit lot, and have been doing so for years. And all of these developments were built with some parking. I predict there will be backlash once the new projects you mentioned are fully leased. But, of course the damage will have been done by then, and we’ll likely have different planning commission and city council members by then.

  4. Eileen Samitz

    Great Article an I agree with Alan Miller completely. The Lumberyard project being built by a Tandem Properties partner (i.e. and Village Farms partner) for over 200 apartments is essentially another mega-dorm, but worse, because even the mega-dorms offered some parking.

    So, this will be the 14th apartment complex that Tandem owns in Davis which will also be predominately UCD students which will further de-motivate UCD to build on- campus housing. This is a very symbiotic relationship for these developers and UCD, but not for Davis. As UCD continues to push roughly 60% of their enormous student population (approximately 40,000 now) off campus, that in turn is pushing our workers and families out of Davis’ housing and raising housing costs.

    UCD’s negligence to build much more and much denser housing on campus is contributing to decreasing the number of kids enrolled in our grade schools at a time when we want to avoid school closures.

  5. ER

    The NO Parking Spaces Developments will COMPLETELY exclude all families with small children. There is no school nearby. These units are for young adults who mostly eat out. Seniors cannot easily use these units because anytime they need to get to a doctor’s appointment, or go grocery shopping, they will have to rely on a friend or a relative.

    That being said, knowing that a Tandem Properties (the Village Farms Developer) partner is the developer for the Lumberyard, puts into crystal clear focus why The Village Farms folks bullied and shoved past the proper EIR processes to get their project onto the ballot before November: they knew these other downtown projects were moving forward and would lessen their trumped up messaging on the lack of building projects in Davis. And the sad part is that City Council went along with this abuse of power.

  6. There is another very specific side effect of having 0 parking spaces in a project. Accessible parking (formerly known as handicap parking) requirements are based on total number of parking spaces. If a project builds zero parking spaces, then there are zero accessible spaces required. That is a requirement the developer is more than happy to meet. Zero accessible spaces means zero people who rely on their own car for disability reasons have a place to park so why would they live there? not providing accessible parking excludes a wide range of people with physical disabilities from living there. Or for that matter, it certainly complicates any visitation to the building for people with disabilities that limit mobility. How did Davis approve a project so hostile to people with disabilities?

  7. Ron O

    Onsite parking is a MITIGATION regarding the negative impact of development on a pre-existing city – that’s why they were created. Eliminating them is a gift to developers AND a permanent negative impact for existing cities.

    Folks, this is the type of thing that happens when you buy into the fake housing shortage claims, and allow those type of people to hold public office.

    Ultimately, you get what you deserve in regard to the interests, politicians and policies that you support.

    Apparently, parking isn’t already difficult enough at places like University Mall for example. Some sought to make that situation worse as well, by including a dormitory above it.

    I guess I’ll see if I continue to periodically shop at the Co-Op, or if I’ll eventually just ask for my full membership fee back after these latest developments are built.

Leave a comment