Davisite Banner. Left side the bicycle obelisk at 3rd and University. Right side the trellis at the entrance to the Arboretum.

A Response to the Flatlander Concerning City Council Candidate Linda Deos

Deos

Linda Deos

By M E Gladis

Alert to Voters for Davis City Council:

The Flatlander May 2018 issue, page 23 “Davis City Council Campaign” chart regarding Linda Deos is wrong. Just this side of suing for slander, so far, I am enraged that Robert Milbrodt would stoop to such a heinous depiction of any opponent of the candidate, Ezra Beeman, that he is promoting. Let me say that Ezra Beeman has strengths.

My issue is with the blatant misrepresentation of Linda Deos that Robert Milbrodt published and disseminated on the page 23 chart that Linda Deos favors developers, does not explain her values or vision, is not prepared, is not consistent.

 

Anyone who has seen her literature or chatted with her understands she does NOT favor developers. A Sacramento developer sent her a stack of checks which she promptly returned. She is not taking any money from anyone who would appear before the Davis City Council.

That position of Linda Deos speaks volumes of values. It keeps her “Independent.”

From the Linda Deos campaign card:
“As residents, we’re all proud to call Davis our home.We love our parks and greenbelts. We love our tree canopy. And yes, we love our electric cars and bicycles. We also face many challenges including pressure for new development, closing shops, disappearing green spaces and rising rents. I will work to be an informed, effective advocate for our community and I know we’ll succeed if we face these challenges together.”

There Linda Deos has made a straight-forward statement of values. As she listens to Davis residents at tabling I have heard Linda Deos on many occasions asking voters what questions they have or what their issues are. Linda is a great listener.

She continues on her campaign card with these points:
“We need responsible development…”
“We need to focus on our infrastructure…”
“We need to utilize available land within Davis more efficiently…”
“We need to work with the County to improve mental health services for the homeless and work with the University to build more student housing.”

“We need to encourage economic development while remaining focused on cost containment.”

These represent her vision for the people who live in Davis and those who want to live in Davis.

For that chart to indicate that Linda Deos is not prepared is slanderous. On the one hand, Linda Deos for a long time has attended Davis City Council meetings staying until the end. She has attended numerous commission meetings. She has familiarized herself with the workings of the Davis city government.

On the other hand, her multi-decade work as a civil attorney gives her the experience in negotiating with large, and medium entities as well as with individuals. She has repeatedly negotiated settlements bringing all sides to recognize the benefit to them. Since she has handled bankruptcies for business and individuals she is familiar with finances.

Linda Deos has an amiable disposition and has the will to work for the rights of people. She is willing to take any questions and give a direct answer. Also she asks questions and keeps a focus on getting a direct answer.

She will adjust her work schedule so that it will not interfere with her Davis City Council duties. She will remain truthful and direct.

For Robert Milbrodt to classify Linda Deos as inconsistent is another unjustified charge. Yes, Linda Deos had one item that she considered and then issued a clear statement clarifying her stand on it. For that issue and other issues she has been on point and consistent with every statement and with every person she encounters. You can always count on her to answer any forum question directly and clearly. She does not talk around an issue. Linda Deos states her direct position on it.

I offer Linda Deos as the most qualified and most prepared candidate for Davis City Council.

M E Gladis is Chair of the Yolo County Progressives

Davisite logo

Did you enjoy reading this article? Then subscribe to the Davisite for free and never miss a post again.

Comments

2 responses to “A Response to the Flatlander Concerning City Council Candidate Linda Deos”

  1. Matt Williams

    Politics is partisan blood sport, and the partisanship often is single-threaded based on a single issue. Bob’s Flatlander article and M E’s response above are testament to that.
    My personal suspicion is that Ezra and Linda share more values than they don’t share, and have quite similar visions for the future of Davis. I encourage both Linda and Ezra to take this opportunity to get together and tell the readers of the Davisite and the Flatlander (and voters everywhere) about the opportunities they have to work together on the Council if they have the good fortune to both be elected. A clear display of their ability to listen to one another and collaborate would be a demonstration of the leadership that the Davis City Council badly needs.
    That’s my opinion, for what it is worth.

  2. Bob Milbrodt

    Matt,
    I can confidently say that none of the Flatlander volunteers regard politics as a blood sport. I did not write the entire piece that is referenced above, but I did write the last line in the council evaluation that seems to have caused offense. When confronted with this issue, I was told that substituting “development” in the place of “developer” would have been acceptable. I don’t know if that is the view of Linda Deos or the view of her volunteer but it is not much of a distinction.
    The purpose of the table in question was to convey to the reader the tendency the candidates would exhibit in considering developer/development projects. In considering the forum and written responses provided by each candidate, the Flatlander considered whether their test for project approval was a bias in favoring the developer/development or in favoring the standards and desires of the community. Candidates tending toward “development” approval were identified as favoring the developer rather than the community.
    Nothing else was meant by the use of that word, and I certainly do not view “developer” as a derogatory term. Developers provide an important service to our community, building the projects and creating the sense of place that we all desire. The Flatlander volunteers just happen to espouse the apparently unpopular view that developers should construct projects that are desired by the community rather than what is desired by developers, city staff, or elected representatives.
    Another complaint about this table regarded a reference to whether candidates are “prepared” for serving on the city council. When a candidate provides inconsistent or incomplete answers it is easy to charge them with trying to appeal to every side of an issue, or for being uninformed. Such charges are seldom the case. It is more often the case that the candidate has just not given adequate consideration to the issues. The polite way of describing this condition is to say that they are not prepared.
    To site a few examples… How do you reconcile a candidate saying that a lack of parking and a lack of appropriate retail and restaurant options keeps them from shopping downtown Davis, when at a subsequent forum the same person claims to frequent those downtown shops and has no trouble finding parking? How do you reconcile a candidate advocating inclusive city policies while supporting projects that seek to exclude all but students from the affordable housing units? How do you reconcile a candidate wavering on the single most important land use policy in the city? One candidate stated a desire to repeal the Citizen’s Right to Vote (Masure J/R), saying it would be difficult to take away the public’s vote but it should be tried. Within a week, this same candidate claimed to be a strong supporter for Measure J/R and wanted to make it stronger. At a subsequent forum, this same candidate declared support for Measure J/R as long as it was amended to include participation from the city commissions. But, that is already a part of the Measure J/R process. Not prepared is the kindest answer.
    I believe all nine candidates have a lot in common. Where they differ is what counts, and the Flatlander is drawing out some of those distinctions. But, explaining those differences is a difficult task with candidates who are not fully prepared.
    I genuinely like and respect all of the candidates and this author as well. I just wish we could learn to disagree with one another without degenerating into animosity or impugning someone else’s intentions.
    Bob Milbrodt

Leave a comment