Recently I heard someone describe Davis in print as a "company town". This was in the context of the housing needs of local residents and/or students. This writer also made some cheap shot about "Without UCD, we'd be Dixon or Vacaville" and I am sure the good people who live in those towns did not appreciate that slap, just like some voters in the 2016 did not like being called "deplorables". C'mon have some manners!
But that is not my main point here. The main point is: Who wants to be a company town anyway? Historically company towns were situations where a large employer manipulated the employees of the company and residents of the nearby town for their own economic benefit…. essentially making the residents indentured servants. Is that the kind of relationship we want between UCD and the town? I think not.
We need vastly different relations between UC Davis and the City of Davis. Different as in "better". Better as in "more respectful, more thoughtful, more collaborative, more mutually beneficial". Seems that the local branch of "The Great University" (from which I have two degrees by the way) has let its almighty autonomy go to its head and decide that it can be a bad neighbor "doing its own thing" instead of a good partner regarding the housing issue… which we share.
We share the problem, why not share the solution? And I mean really share the solution in important ways, not just in a token fashion.
Step up, UCD and work with us to write a Long Range Plan that works for everybody!
PS Want read more about company towns? Here's a link to the "source of all knowledge" aka wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_town



Leave a comment